Privatized Prisons The Systemized Injustice Of America...

Paradise Valley Community College Privatized Prisons: The Systemized Injustice of America Shaelyn Ellershaw Frilot ENG102 2 May 2016 The United States is regarded as a country of innovation and progress. However, the prison and disciplinary systems in the U.S. fall short in several aspects. With the highest incarceration rate in the world, one might expect American prisons to be prepared for providing quality care and rehabilitation for inmates. Unfortunately, this is not the reality - with a growing number of privatized prisons, the quality of life for inmates and their families is dissipating. The U.S. prison system is in desperate need of reform; closing down private prisons will help in alleviating monetary pressure, reducing abuse reports, and lowering the rate of reincarceration in individuals. Prison reform should be seen as a priority, as nonviolent offenders are suffering far more than they should, and are purposely conditioned to be reincarcerated after their release. Private prisons are rapidly growing in the U.S. to keep up with a growing number of inmates. With the rising number of prisoners, prisone r abuse levels are also rising exponentially. This is due to the fact that private prisons are a booming industry that exploits prisoners for profits. Private prisons may seem beneficial at a glance; however, they enforce lax regulations and are notorious for overcrowding and â€Å"barbaric† conditions. Prisons should rehabilitate nonviolent offenders in

Marketing Plan for Burts Bees - 2374 Words

Prepare a marketing plan for Burt’s Bees to further their presence in Scandinavian and Nordic countries. Executive Summary The following marketing plan forms the basis for the introduction of Burt’s Bees brand. The analysis allows us to outline the best strategies to follow for the achievement of the company’s strategic goals in the Scandinavian market and of its potential would be enable Burt’s Bees to be fully informed of their target market and be able to introduce and sell their cosmetics into the Nordic countries. It enable the company to gain an full analysis of the market and its potential, a clear identification of the target groups, development of the brand with an appropriate a range of marketing tools to launch and promote†¦show more content†¦Economic view: Most of the Nordic countries have positive growth in GDP, which means the people have more disposable income – the amount of money that households have available for spending and saving after income taxes have been accounted for. Technological trends: With new production and communication technologies, Burt’s Bees are suitable to perform better advertisements and promotions for the products. For instance, Burt’s Bees can advertise their products through the social networks, like Facebook and Youtube etc. Social – Ecological trends: With a focus on sustainability, Burt’s Bees’ natural cosmetics goods are a very good advantage to stay in the market due to the fact that people are paying more attention on environmental friendly goods. SWOT Analysis The SWOT analysis analyses the company’s strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats, therefore Burt’s Bees can counter a few critical weaknesses that could threaten our ability to build profitability and the market position. Strengths: - Effective product - Customers loyalty - Experienced management team - Organic Weaknesses: - Low brand awareness - Low budgets Opportunities: - Huge growth

Fundamentals A Business Law Revised Edition â€Myassignmenthelp.Com

Question: Discuss About The Fundamentals A Business Law Revised Edition? Answer: Introducation A contractual relationship exists when the parties formulate a contract amid themselves. A contract is an outcome of mutual exchange of promises. When an offeror and an offeree exchange promises amid them with the intention to abide by the same legally, then, there is formation of contract. (Barron, 2013) So, the main components of contract that are required are: An offer A proposal sent by an offeror to an offeree with a view of approval is an offer. An offer is a resemblance of the intention of the offeror which is conveyed to an offeree(Australian Woollen Mills Pty Ltd v The Commonwealth, 1954). The intention of the offeror signifies his wish to conduct any act or inaction which he desires from the offeree to approve. An offer can either by written or oral but must be clear and unambiguous. The offeror may send the offer to people at large or one person but to whom so ever the offer is made, the offeree must be identified in law(CAMPBELL v THE UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE, 2006). An acceptance An acceptance is the intention of the offeree which is communicated back to an offeror. The communication is the approval of the offer that is sent to him (Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Company, 1892). It is necessary that the acceptance must be the mirror image of the offer in order to be valid. If changes are brought in while accepting the offer then it is not an offer in law. Rather, it is counter offer which cancels the original offer and it is the counter offer which becomes the new offer in law(Hyde v Wrench, 1840). Consideration A consideration is value for promises which is moved from one party to another. It is a value which supports the promises and makes such promises enforceable in law. Consideration can be anything of value and need not be sufficient in law(Placer Development Ltd v Commonwealth, 1969). Legal intention The intention of the offeror and the offeree when marketing the offer and the acceptance must be such which portrays legal intention, that is, the promises must be made by the parties with consent that in case of dispute they are willing to go to the court of law. Legal intention is presumed to be present in commercial contract and absent in social contract but this presumption is rebuttable in law(Ermogenous v Greek Orthodox Community of SA Inc, 2002). Capacity The offeror and the offeree must be persons of capacity, that is, they must be mentally sound, should not be minor and are not barred by law. (Latimer, 2015) When all these five components are comply with by the parties, then, there is a valid contract that is established which has the enforceability in law. A contract is the combination of five core elements, that is, offer, acceptance, intention, capacity and consideration. These five core elements are prime ingredients of any contract formation. With the help of these elements two types of contract can be formed. (Graw, 2014) When the contract is made with the help of words, then, such are oral contracts. When the offeror makes the offer verbally which is accepted by the offeree verbally and all other contract essential are present then it is an oral contract. When the offer and acceptance is exchanged amid the parties with the help of pen on the piece of paper, then, it is a written contract.(Findlaw, 2017) Both of these contracts are valid and enforceable in law. The only requirements are that all contract essentials must be present. So, there is no need that the contract must be in writing in order to be binding in nature. However, when analyze from the point of view of enforceability then the written contracts are preferable when compared with the written contract. The main reasons as to why a written contract is preferable against oral contracts are, firstly, the contents of the written contract can be easily determined by reading and if the parties or the court does not able to understand the term then the term can be interpreted by reading the written terms; secondly, people tend to forget and if the terms are in written form then it is easy to determine the true intentions of the parties; thirdly, it is one of the best evidence that is normally relied upon by the courts; fourthly, a written contract depicts the intention of the parties at the time when the contract was actually established by the parties.(Findlaw, 2017) Because of these reasons it is found that the written contracts are better than oral contracts. Though both are valid but when it comes to proving the terms of the contract, written contracts are considered to be better in nature. A contract is a legal document which is formed by persons by making an offer, accepting the same, combined with consideration with legal intention and the parties making the same must be capable enough to enter into the contract.(Latimer, 2015) With the help of these contracts the parties are able to make oral contracts or written contracts which are binding in nature. These are another kind of written contract that are normally established by the parties and is called formal contracts mainly because there are few formalities which needs to be accomplished by the parties. normally formal contracts are of two kinds; firstly, those contracts which are established by the parties in the form of deeds, that is, the contract is signed by the parties and witnessed by at least one person; secondly, those contracts which are derived from the court judgments, that is, to remain calm and composed, maintain peace, etc. These are the two kinds of contracts which are different from a written contract mainly because there are few formalities which are require to be prove. Now, what are the basic formalities which need to be accomplished in order to make a written contract into a formal contract? The basic formalities are:(Christensen Dun can, 2009) That the contract must be in writing and is the basic necessity of every formal contract; That the contract must be signed by the parties. it is very necessary that the contract must be signed by the parties in order to categories the contract as formal contract; That the contract is an exchange of promises amid the parties. It is not necessary that the contract should be supported by any kind of consideration to make it enforceable in law; When these contracts are established then the contracts are enforceable for a period of twelve years. This is the life span of these contracts and after that they cease to exist. Is the contract that is established amid the group of friends socially is binding in nature or is not enforceable because of lack of legal intention?A valid contract requires few contract ingredients to make it valid and enforceable in law. The same are offer, acceptance, consideration, legal intention and capacity of the parties. The offeror must make an offer to an offeree which should be accepted by the offeree without any variation. This offer and acceptance is called an agreement and when made by capable parties along with consideration with legal intention then there is valid contract amid the parties. (Latimer, 2015) In order to make a contract enforceable in law and does not fall into the category of social gathering or communication, it is very necessary that the intention when the promises are exchanged amid the parties should be with legal intention. Legal intention signifies that the parties are willing to comply with the terms of the contract legally, that is, if any dispute arises then they intent to go court for settlement. The law has made presumptions regarding the legal intention of the parties. It is submitted that the court considers that there is no legal intention amid the parties if the parties are sharing cordial, family, social and friendly relationship(Ermogenous v Greek Orthodox Community of SA Inc, 2002). It is also presumed by the courts that there is no legal intention amid the parties if the parties are in commercial or business management relationships(J Evans Son (Portsmouth) Ltd v Andrea Merzario Ltd , 1976). But, this basic supposition of law can be disregarded by the court if the parties are capable enough to prove the same otherwise with the help of evidence(Snelling v John G Snelling Ltd, 1969). In ( Simpkins v Pays, 1955), it was held that the parties are friends when they bought a lottery ticket but they intend to share the prize. Thus, there is business relationship that is intended by the parties. So, there is legal intention and the contract is enforceable in law. The law is now applied to the facts of the case. Application It is submitted that few friends meet at the hotel for drinks. Every person contributed $ 2 for a lottery and one person is given responsibility to buy the ticket. It is submitted that when the lottery was announced, the friends won the prise but the buyer of the ticket (one of the friends) claim that there is no contract between them as there can be no contract amid friends (Balfour v Balfour, 1919). But, as per ( Simpkins v Pays, 1955) since the main intention of the friends was to share the money and not to carry out the transaction in the friendly manner. Thus, there is business relationship amid them. When a person employees another person then the person who employs is called an employer or principal and the person who is employed is called an employee. Now, the employee can be an agent of the employer or the independent contractor of the employer depending upon the control the employer exercise upon the employee. When the employee is the agent of the employer then the employer exerts control upon the agent and delegates certain tasks upon the agent which he must furnish. An agent is the person who carries out the functions of the employer to the extent he is authorized to do so. Beyond that an agent is not allowed to represent the employer in front of the third parties(SCOTT V DAVIS, 2000). Thus, from the employers point of view an employer is liable for only those actions of the agent for which the agent is authorized. The liability of the authorized actions of the agent falls upon the principal. But, the case is different if the employee is the independent contractor of the employer. When the employee is the independent contractor, than, he is not the authorized repetitive of the employer. Rather, he is not working under the control of the employer and the tasks that are granted to the contractor must be carried out by him with his own free will. He is allowed to decide the time of work, place of work, the people required to carry out the work, etc(Colonial Mutual Life Assurance Society Ltd v Producers and Citizens Co-Operative Assurance Co, 1931). Thus, from the principal point of view, the liability that originates by an independent contractor while carrying out the task is wholly upon the independent contractor and the principal is nowhere accountable for the same. (MCCARTHY, 2004) Thus, it is very important to distinguish between a party who is an agent for a principal, from that of an independent contractor, mainly because to determine the liability of the principal. If the relationship is with an agent then the principal can be liable for authorized act and if thee relationship is with contractor then the principal is not held liable. References Simpkins v Pays (1955). Australian Woollen Mills Pty Ltd v The Commonwealth (1954). Balfour v Balfour (1919). Barron, M. (2013). Fundamentals of business law revised edition (7th ed.). . Australia: McGraw Hill Education. . CAMPBELL v THE UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE (2006). Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Company (1892). Christensen, S. A., Duncan, W. D. (2009). Sale of Businesses in Australia. Federation Press. Colonial Mutual Life Assurance Society Ltd v Producers and Citizens Co-Operative Assurance Co (1931). Ermogenous v Greek Orthodox Community of SA Inc (2002). Findlaw. (2017). Is a verbal management legally binding? Retrieved September 19, 2017, from Findlaw: https://www.findlaw.com.au/articles/5626/is-a-verbal-agreement-legally-binding.aspx Graw, S. (2014). An introduction to the law of contract (8th ed.). . Australia: Law Book Co. of Australasia. . Hyde v Wrench (1840). J Evans Son (Portsmouth) Ltd v Andrea Merzario Ltd (1976). Latimer, P. (2015). Australian business law (34th ed.). . North Ryde: CCH Australia. MCCARTHY, L. (2004). VICARIOUS LIABILITY IN THE AGENCY CONTEXT. Placer Development Ltd v Commonwealth (1969). SCOTT V DAVIS (2000). Snelling v John G Snelling Ltd (1969).

Alexander the Great Obituary. Essay Example For Students

Alexander the Great: Obituary. Essay I wrote this obituary to let you know that Alexander has passed on. First I want to tell you what an honor it is to be a general in his army. I remember standing next to him thinking I am one of the few who have seen the look on his face when we took over his Fathers dream, Persia. When we won the battle of Grannies in 334 B. C. He appointed me to General. Then we marched on to USA where we took that over and I noticed something I never seen a leader do. He was fighting on the front line with the soldiers and l. He was very ecstatic as we marched on to India were we where forced to turn around by our own troops. He was very disappointed but he knew that his very strategic war plans and strategic mind had expanded his empire this far. He like most soldiers were never scared and if he was did not show it. The most beautiful place we went to and by far most beautiful was Babylon. The people there were nice and the city was colorful with green everywhere. I think if he wanted to die that is the place he would want to be. And with that statement I would like to wrap this oration up with a thank you to Alexander for all your expertise on the battle field and kindness off. So thank you and rest In peace.

Affordable Health Care for America Act Approved by the House of Representatives on 7 Nov 2009

Table of Contents Introduction A Brief Explanation of the Law Thesis Section Opposing Views Conclusion Works Cited Introduction Law has been an integral component of all societies whether civilized or primitive, big or small, rich or poor, strong or weak, since the very humble beginnings of human civilization. Societies have always had notions of what is permissible or impermissible and what is right or wrong. At a deeper level, law is a manifestation of people’s ideals.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Affordable Health Care for America Act Approved by the House of Representatives on 7 Nov 2009 specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More It is a reflection of a society’s appreciation of its imperfections and the need to achieve order and sustain harmonious interaction between individuals and groups. It is an expression of a society’s desire to guide, direct, and control its destiny in terms of socio -economic and political development and safeguard justice, which underpins societal order. This paper is a discussion of the Affordable Health Care for America Act approved by the House of Representatives on 7 Nov 2009. This legislative instrument has attracted important and at the same time, interesting debates from different individuals and groups of the differing sections of the multifaceted American society. Therefore, this discussion is an addition of pertinent opinions and perspectives regarding the need for the form of healthcare guiding principle provided by this law, which the reader will obviously find worth considering. In short, this paper is an affirmative argument in favor of this critical healthcare legislation. A Brief Explanation of the Law Virtually, every sound member of a given society yearns to have good health for a prolonged period, and where possible, prolonged lifespan. In deed, a healthy population is a requisite for sustainable social, economic, and politi cal development. Consequently, the government, especially in a welfare economy, shoulders the responsibility of providing quality health care services to all citizens irrespective of their race, ethnic background, age, gender, religion, or political affiliation. It also has a duty of ensuring that necessary preventive measures are put in place in order to safeguard the health of its subjects. In fact, within the well-established welfare economies like the United States and the Scandinavian nations in Europe, health care service is more of a basic human right to which all individuals and groups are entitled rather than a commodity that is available for sale in the market. This democratic principle of governance forms the background that has informed the need for this form of law in the American marketplace (House Committee on Energy and Commerce 320). However, it is pertinent to note that, many factors are traceable in the Unites States’ histories, which have influenced its fo rmulation.Advertising Looking for essay on health law? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More The intent of this law is to make available, an inexpensive health care coverage for all Americans and to put a hold on growth in national health care spending and other practical reasons. This law intends to expand health care coverage to around forty million Americans, who are currently uninsured, by reducing the cost of health care insurance and making the overall American health care system more efficient (OpenCongress Para 1; House Committee on Energy and Commerce 318). The law comprises a new government-run health insurance plan, popularly referred to as a public option, meant to compete with private insurance companies in health care coverage (OpenCongress Para 1). It provides that all Americans should have health insurance and outlaws denying coverage because of a pre-existing health condition of an individual (House Committee on Ene rgy and Commerce 318). It also includes surtax on individuals with an income exceeding $500,000. Broadly speaking, this law seeks to introduce strong insurance market reforms in to U.S healthcare system. Its proponents believe that the system has dire broken aspects that disadvantage millions of the helpless Americans. According to House Committee on Energy and Commerce, to improve the situation, the law has sought to introduce a new national health insurance exchange in order to ensure that â€Å"†¦individuals and small groups can purchase health benefits, with a choice among private insurers and a new public option competing on a level field† (319). Another important intention of the law is the enhancement of a shared duty among government, individuals, and employers in matters of health care coverage. Therefore, under this law, employers, apart from small employers, are expected to provide legally recognizable health benefits or contribute toward the costs of health c are. In addition, individuals are expected to have health insurance.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Affordable Health Care for America Act Approved by the House of Representatives on 7 Nov 2009 specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More The law is meant to facilitate new insurance changes and supervision by the state and federal governments with a view to create an economy that promotes competition and choice. At the same time, the law seeks to ensure that health coverage is made available for Americans who are less privileged and who need help (House Committee on Energy and Commerce 319; Jacobs and Skocpol 215). Policymaking and implementation, in a democratic culture, is hardly a preserve of the government exclusively. Various relevant stakeholders of a given socio-economic sector have a right to take part in the formulation and implementation process of a policy, especially policies regarded as critical. Therefore, va rious active institutional participants took part in the creation and implementation of the Affordable Health Care Act 2009. Thesis Section This paper is an assenting argument in favor of the Affordable Health Care Act of 2009. As pointed out earlier, the provision of quality and affordable health care services is a core responsibility of the American government. However, it is important to note that private health care sector plays a critical role in the provision of health care services. There are many reasons that support my agreement with this important law. First, from a constitutional and moral point of view, all Americans have, and should enjoy, an inalienable right to quality and affordable health care services. As such, the government has the responsibility of intervening on any health care matter that comes as an obstacle to citizenry access to quality health care services. Health care coverage is certainly a big issue of national concern with respect to any government tha t has due respect for its citizenry’s well being, because it touches on individuals and groups’ ability to access quality health care services when need be. For instance, the available statistics from the U.S Census Bureau approximated that, over 45.7 million Americans were uninsured as of 2007 (House Committee on Energy and Commerce 320). This was equivalent to about one-seventh of the American population. Yet, even though the American government spends hugely on health care, it scores averagely, on quality-of-health care indicators. Therefore, the Obama administration’s success in instituting this legislation was timely and highly welcome. Second, there are sufficient economic reasons that necessitate the need for this legislation. Rising healthcare costs are a critical public policy concern and a major impetus of the requisite to reform the U.S healthcare system.Advertising Looking for essay on health law? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More For example, in the year 2008, the U.S spent roughly $ 2.4 trillion, or 17 % of GDP, on national health (House Committee on Energy and Commerce 320). Here, it is pertinent to note that the government is always under pressure to ensure fair spending on all socio-economic and political sub-systems that are under its management. Therefore, it is economically practical to reform the healthcare system in order to curb unnecessary and preventable budget strains on government, families, and businesses among other socio-economic sub-systems, which are critical to sustainable development. Moreover, there is an apparent reduction in healthcare coverage and substandard quality in the U.S healthcare system. This legislation is viable because it promises to provide shared responsibility among employers, individuals, state, and federal governments on matters of healthcare service provision and acquisition. While we recognize the benefits of the government’s non-interference in an economy, it is equally significant to appreciate the fact that market forces alone are not sufficient in cushioning the economically less privileged from the rising costs of health care. As a result, the government should intervene and to facilitate competition and choice where possible. This law will ensure that the uninsured and financially less privileged Americans have an affordable public option to turn to for healthcare coverage. The competition and choice introduced by this legislation will cushion millions of Americans from the current health insurance coverage and premiums, which have been growing swiftly (House Committee on Energy and Commerce 320). Furthermore, these laws will relieve employers from exorbitant healthcare coverage for employees and their families. In the past and currently, employers have been encountering an ever-increasing challenge of paying expensive health benefits as costs of health insurance rise, while at the same time trying to cut on labor costs in order to succeed in an increasingly competitive market (House Committee on Energy and Commerce 320). Thirdly, from a moral viewpoint, the Affordable Care Act will assist in reducing the rampant inequalities in access to health care among the Americans. Currently, racial and ethnic minorities, low-income Americans, and underserved populations tend to have higher rates of sickness, reduced access to healthcare, and fewer treatment alternatives (HealthCare.gov Para 1). In addition, these groups are also more likely to lack health insurance in comparison to other groups of the population. The Affordable Care Act will reduce disparities in health care access, by addressing significant health care access and initiating improvements in the health care personnel and public health. It also provides for critical expansion in community health centers to promote access to the required health care services (House Committee on Energy and Commerce 319; HealthCare.gov Para 1). It also intends to improve health care personnel investments by increasing financing of training for basic care doctors, public health professionals, and nurses with unique attention to the labor force diversity and the requirements of the health care shortage departments (House Committee on Energy and Commerce 320; HealthCare.gov Para 1-6). It also seeks to reduce disparities by investing in local public, state, and territorial health infrastructure. Finally, it promises to make improvements in research and embrace policy improvements, in both community and clinical preventive services, and removal of cost sharing on particular preventive services (House Committee on Energy and Commerce 320). Finally, yet importantly, there is an evident close link between access to affordable and quality health care services and health insurance. Unfortunately, there has been a sharp decline in health coverage, which is even projected, by the relevant stakeholders such as the Institute of Medicine (IOM) of the National Acad emies, to continue if the U.S’ healthcare system will remain unreformed. The IOM points out that, health coverage is fundamental to personal health and wellbeing because, for the uninsured people, there is a gap between health care needs and acquisition of health care services regardless of availability of some safety net services (House Committee on Energy and Commerce 322). Moreover, the IOM asserts that high numbers of people without health insurance may undermine health care for people with health insurance (House Committee on Energy and Commerce 322). Concisely, high levels of uninsured, and underinsured, individuals in the U.S present critical challenges to public policy makers. These challenges necessitate the reforms of the health care system and health insurance industry, which play a significant role in facilitating individuals and groups’ to access health care services (House Committee on Energy and Commerce 322; American Association of College of Pharmacy P ara 2). Therefore, the Affordable Care Act is a giant step towards the United States’ efforts to make its healthcare system more efficient. Opposing Views As mentioned earlier, policy creation and implementation is not an exclusive function of the government. Rather, a process that attracts inputs, views, opinions, and ideas of various individuals and groups with stakes. In other words, the making and implementation process of a given policy faces support and opposition almost in equal measure. Unfortunately, various relevant societal groups and stakeholders in the sector view implications of a particular policy as either beneficial or unfair. Therefore, these social and political formations seek to lobby legislators to pass, amend, or even reject a given proposed bill depending on their perceptions of a bill, as well as, their interests in relation to changes provided by a given legislative policy. Perhaps, the Affordable Health Care for America bill encountered the toughest opposition than any other legislative policy proposed by the Obama administration (Vivar 7). The toughest opposition to the Affordable Care Bill came from the Republicans. For Republicans, the Democrats’ idea of the government assuming a leading role in health care insurance market was incompatible with their ideas. Therefore, the Republicans strongly opposed the idea of a public option. Unfortunately, even though this law remains a highly contested issue, the major focus of the arguments is based on partisan issues, instead of an in-depth review of the actual policy. For instance, according to Georgetown Public Policy Review, contrary to claims by government organs such as the Congressional Budget Office (CBO), this law is neither cost effective nor able to facilitate reduction in the amount of money spent on national health care system (Para 1). This opposing camp asserts that, even though the Affordable Care Act is expected to reduce the deficit by about $ 230 billion dur ing the first decade of its implementation, the overall health care reform will cost the government $ 938 billion over ten years (Kahn, Karl, and Wolf cited in Georgetown Public Policy Review Para 2). These opponents argue that, in order for this law to help the government save money, instead of inflicting costs up on the taxpayers, the controversial Medicare cuts must occur and that the estimated costs aught to have been projected correctly; something which, in reality, remains relatively unknown (Georgetown Public Policy Review Para 2). The opposing camp also denounces the prospects of the Affordable Care Act helping employers to save money on health care costs as promised by this law. The dissenting camp holds that as opposed to helping employers reduce save money on health costs, health care costs are projected to increase apart from for three percent of all employers. In turn, because of the current American economic instability, more people will lose their jobs. Therefore, giv en the factor of time, this camp maintains that the United States’ unstable economy should focus on job creation now, as opposed to running the risk of rendering more people jobless. The antagonists further opine that, the need for waivers by employers from the government as a temporary fix meant to help them maneuver around these new health care regulations, is an indication that its legal requirements are not practical (Georgetown Public Policy Review Para 4). Consequently, if companies fail to ask for waivers from the government, they must comply with regulations of the new health care policy, which opponents regard as unrealistic; or be forced to hire more temporary or contracting workers instead of full time employees. Irrespective of the apparent opposition to the Affordable Health care Act, the most important fact is that all groups acknowledge the need to reform the U.S health care system. They only differ on the important question of how then the system should be ref ormed to make it efficient. While we cannot pretend that the Affordable Health care law creation, and its implementation process, will not cost our government substantial amounts of money, the ultimate benefits promised by this law are worth its costs of implementation. It is economically arguable that the more broken the U.S health care system is now, the more it shall cost the government to reform. Therefore, participants should guard against the dangers of being over obsessed with the cost of effecting necessary reforms into our health care system at the expense of the long-term benefits that are bound to accrue from this law. After all, we cannot dissemble that our current healthcare system is perfect, or that another alternative law will be perfect. In other words, even though this law has its own flaws, it is a perfect starting point for establishing sustainable and implementable health care reform. Conclusion It is evident, now and in the past, that the American healthcare sy stem requires sustainable reforms through a legislative policy that is realistic and implementable. This paper supports the Affordable Health Care for America law of 2009 irrespective of the unavoidable flaws, which are usually common in any given policy. Its benefits outweigh its implementation costs and leave a room for any changes that can make it better. In deed, it is now a fact that, this bill will always be the starting point of any proposed health care changes. Above everything else, fear of competition should not be given a room in our quest to establish a health care system that is responsive to our diverse socio-economic privileges and needs. Therefore, a public option is worth considering given the inability of our economic system to cater for the needs of all people uniformly and fairly. Works Cited American Association of College of Pharmacy (AACP). Affordable Care Act Implementation, 2011. Web. Georgetown Public Policy Review. The (Un) Affordable Care  Act. 2011. We b. HealthCare.gov. Health Disparities and the Affordable Care Act, 2011. Web. HealthCare.gov. Understanding the Affordable Care Act: Introduction, 2011. Web. House Committee on Energy and Commerce. Report of the Committee on Energy and Commerce on H.R. 3200. Washington, D.C: Government Printing Office, 2010. Print. Jacobs, Lawrence, and Skocpol, Theda. Health Care Reform and American Politics: What Everyone Needs to Know: What Everyone Needs to Know Series. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010. Print. OpenCongress. H.R.3962 – Affordable Health Care for America Act, 2011. Web. Vivar, Luis. Obama’s Health Care Reform 2010: From Change to Concession?: Health Care Reform as an Example for Structural Resistance of the American Political System to Needed Change. New York: Grin Verlag, 2011. Print. This essay on Affordable Health Care for America Act Approved by the House of Representatives on 7 Nov 2009 was written and submitted by user Rosalie H. to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly. You can donate your paper here.

Portland Road Improvements regarding ADA curb cut outs and improvement

Portland Road Improvements regarding ADA curb cut outs and improvement Description This work plan involves the planning of how ADA curb cut outs and improvements are to be carried out at Portland Road Improvements. This is a job that involves improvement of roads and footpaths.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Portland Road Improvements regarding ADA curb cut outs and improvement specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More The various workers in the engineering firm will be assigned the duties which, they are required to carry out. They will also be given the time frame within which they are supposed to complete the jobs. This is important in that it will enable timely completion of the job. Background Work plan is one of the most important activities in an organization. Organizations need to complete their activities in sated time so as to ensure satisfaction to all stake holders. Failure to complete their activities within the stipulated time may lead to losses. Customers loose faith in them and walk away or they maybe dissatisfied and they will not come back another time. It is for this reason that the topic was chosen. Work at Portland Road Improvements need to be planned well so as to ensure timely completion. Media that the presentation will be completed The representation of the work plan will be done on a PowerPoint. This is because PowerPoint can be viewed by a large group of people at a time and it is cheaper in terms of cost as compared to video and other media. On the other hand, it is easy to prepare a PowerPoint and it tikes less time as well. Activities to be completed A research is essential before any work is started. This will help in acquiring information on the work that is to be carried out hence; the firm will be able to carry out the job in the right manner. In carrying out the research, a literature review can be conducted to know what has been written in the past regarding the job the firm is about to carry out. Then an interview can be carried out. T he purpose of an interview is to gather more information from those who may have knowledge of the job. Once exploratory information has been gathered, a draft can be prepared, and then rehearsed before a final representation is done.Advertising Looking for essay on business economics? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Roles of the group members For timely completion of the activity, roles are to be delegated to group members. Some members will be required to carry out the research and the literature review. The other group will be required to carry out the interview. The third group is to prepare a draft. The rehearsal will be carried out by all the group members as well as the final representation. Communication strategy The entire group will be meeting in a weekly basis to review the progress. In the meeting, members will also be required to report any problem they encounter and possible solutions generated by the g roup. Communication about the meeting will be through phone and mail. Resources required For effective completion of the activity, the group will need to have internet resources to assist them in their research, as well as, questionnaires which will assist them in data collection during interviews. Computers and maybe a projector will be crucial for PowerPoint presentation. The members might require some cash for travelling purposes. Risk assessment This topic is very important and need to be successfully completed. If it fails to be completed, the implications could be devastating since it could lead to failure of the entire project. It is therefore, important that the group complete the topic successfully.

Contemp poetry Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words - 1

Contemp poetry - Essay Example For many contemporary poets, Wordsworth remains an inspiration as they continue to investigate their own feelings of loss and aging. However, they necessarily approach the subject from a more contemporary viewpoint that has only become more abstracted and disorganized with the increased speed of modern life. These ideas can be traced through the poetry of Elizabeth Bishop, Frank O’Hara and Rae Armantrout. Elizabeth Bishop employs imagery of the modern world to highlight the loss of youth and loneliness that she finds in the contemporary madness of everyday life. For example, although â€Å"Filling Station† is a playful exchange exploring synonyms, she uses the everyday image of a backwater gas station to investigate ideas of deterioration, loss of beauty and the feeble attempts of someone to cling to the pure. Everything within the filling station is â€Å"oil-soaked, oil-permeated / to a disturbing, over-all / black translucency† (3-5) which is only interrupted by a small stack of colorful comic books that â€Å"lie / upon a big dim doily / draping a taboret† (23-25). The metaphysical question, â€Å"Why, oh why, the doily?† (30) emphasizes the sense of lost meaning that is embodied in the presence of something beautiful in this world of aged mechanics. While the sense of self is represented in the presence of the doily and the small plant near it, it is nearly entirely subsumed by the oil and grease that permeates everything in the shop, turning all into a postmodern concept of cyborg automaton. The loneliness of the self is complicated by feelings of guilt and shame only acquired through the passage of time and loss in Bishop’s â€Å"Five Flights Up.† While the guilt permeates the poem, the memory of its cause does not make an appearance, indicating the inescapable nature of it in the new world. Any joy in the bird’s or the dog’s greeting for the new day is